Over the past three decades we have studied thousands of opportunities and challenges for clients. In the vast majority of those projects, Macro Strategic Design was the only organization being paid directly and solely by the client to analyze and diagnose the MACRO and MICRO aspects of the project. In most cases, the recommendations for the client to act or change or buy some kind of asset, investment or insurance product were introduced and supported exclusively by salespeople or biased advisors whose compensation was directly connected to having the client implement their proposal(s). Without a thorough and unbiased review, our clients would have been “flying blind” so to speak and left vulnerable to the damage that so often occurs when piecemeal or transactional thinking drives a decision. We are not suggesting that all salespeople or advisors with conflicts of interest are not to be trusted. We are suggesting that it is wise to apply competent, unbiased, unconflicted due diligence prior to any significant sale, loan, investment or acquisition.
In wood shop in the seventh grade, Bruce Raymond Wright’s teacher reminded his students daily to “measure twice, cut once.” When dealing with anything of great importance or where holistic synergy is relevant, second or third opinions can save you from making a disastrous mistake. Piecemeal, transactional thinking and action is amongst the most ineffective of human behaviors. Salespeople thrive upon and even depend upon their prospects taking fast and under scrutinized action. Truly client centered, competent and honorable professionals expect and respect a reasonable level of scrutiny (due diligence) and the time necessary for clients to make well informed synergistic decisions. We believe that due diligence is most effective when the process and those performing the evaluation(s) are not conflicted. We do not believe that due diligence performed by the company or person trying to sell the asset to you is optimally effective for the consumer.
When we carefully take measure of a situation from both a MACRO and MICRO perspective, we are able to make more aware, enlightened, holistic and informed decisions. The following story is excerpted from The Wright Exit Strategy - Wealth; How To Create It, Keep It and Use It authored by Bruce Raymond Wright. Bruce updated it slightly for this website in June 2014. It illuminates how a wiser MACRO perspective can be more valuable than even the best of MICRO tactical plans performed by paid advisors (in this case a CPA) and biased salespeople who fail to inquire about, understand and act in support of a client’s highest and best interests.
It is all too common for people to become so focused on a transaction, an opportunity or an adversity that they fail to truly understand the big picture or the “why” that ought to be the driving force behind all decisions to act or not to act. The following story has helped thousands of people avoid very costly mistakes. It has also helped people gain clarity about why, what, where, when and how to take appropriate action. Remember this simple basic part of our due diligence formula:
In wood shop in the seventh grade, Bruce Raymond Wright’s teacher reminded his students daily to “measure twice, cut once.” When dealing with anything of great importance or where holistic synergy is relevant, second or third opinions can save you from making a disastrous mistake. Piecemeal, transactional thinking and action is amongst the most ineffective of human behaviors. Salespeople thrive upon and even depend upon their prospects taking fast and under scrutinized action. Truly client centered, competent and honorable professionals expect and respect a reasonable level of scrutiny (due diligence) and the time necessary for clients to make well informed synergistic decisions. We believe that due diligence is most effective when the process and those performing the evaluation(s) are not conflicted. We do not believe that due diligence performed by the company or person trying to sell the asset to you is optimally effective for the consumer.
When we carefully take measure of a situation from both a MACRO and MICRO perspective, we are able to make more aware, enlightened, holistic and informed decisions. The following story is excerpted from The Wright Exit Strategy - Wealth; How To Create It, Keep It and Use It authored by Bruce Raymond Wright. Bruce updated it slightly for this website in June 2014. It illuminates how a wiser MACRO perspective can be more valuable than even the best of MICRO tactical plans performed by paid advisors (in this case a CPA) and biased salespeople who fail to inquire about, understand and act in support of a client’s highest and best interests.
It is all too common for people to become so focused on a transaction, an opportunity or an adversity that they fail to truly understand the big picture or the “why” that ought to be the driving force behind all decisions to act or not to act. The following story has helped thousands of people avoid very costly mistakes. It has also helped people gain clarity about why, what, where, when and how to take appropriate action. Remember this simple basic part of our due diligence formula:
Macro Perspective Why to do it or not to do it? Where to do it or not to do it? When to do it or not to do it? Who to do it with or not to do it with? In what ways is this important to accomplishing, protecting or furthering my highest and best interests? | Micro Perspective What to do or not to do? How to do it? When to do it or not to do it? Who to do it with or not to do it with? Of the x number of options explored and put through the due diligence process, why is this my most suitable option for accomplishing these goals A ___, B ___, C___, D___? Am I confident that this action or inaction will help rather than hurt my grand vision and best interests? |
After you read the story below, please email us your thoughts about it and we will send you a free gift as a token of our appreciation for your feedback.